Nonin A

CAS# 1357351-29-1

Nonin A

Catalog No. BCN7149----Order now to get a substantial discount!

Product Name & Size Price Stock
Nonin A: 5mg $886 In Stock
Nonin A: 10mg Please Inquire In Stock
Nonin A: 20mg Please Inquire Please Inquire
Nonin A: 50mg Please Inquire Please Inquire
Nonin A: 100mg Please Inquire Please Inquire
Nonin A: 200mg Please Inquire Please Inquire
Nonin A: 500mg Please Inquire Please Inquire
Nonin A: 1000mg Please Inquire Please Inquire

Quality Control of Nonin A

Number of papers citing our products

Chemical structure

Nonin A

3D structure

Chemical Properties of Nonin A

Cas No. 1357351-29-1 SDF Download SDF
PubChem ID 129317369 Appearance Powder
Formula C17H16O5 M.Wt 300.31
Type of Compound Phenols Storage Desiccate at -20°C
Solubility Soluble in Chloroform,Dichloromethane,Ethyl Acetate,DMSO,Acetone,etc.
Chemical Name methyl 6-hydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methylbenzo[h]chromene-5-carboxylate
SMILES CC1(C=CC2=C(O1)C3=CC=CC=C3C(=C2C(=O)OC)O)CO
Standard InChIKey IDZKIDTWFRCHKW-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Standard InChI InChI=1S/C17H16O5/c1-17(9-18)8-7-12-13(16(20)21-2)14(19)10-5-3-4-6-11(10)15(12)22-17/h3-8,18-19H,9H2,1-2H3
General tips For obtaining a higher solubility , please warm the tube at 37 ℃ and shake it in the ultrasonic bath for a while.Stock solution can be stored below -20℃ for several months.
We recommend that you prepare and use the solution on the same day. However, if the test schedule requires, the stock solutions can be prepared in advance, and the stock solution must be sealed and stored below -20℃. In general, the stock solution can be kept for several months.
Before use, we recommend that you leave the vial at room temperature for at least an hour before opening it.
About Packaging 1. The packaging of the product may be reversed during transportation, cause the high purity compounds to adhere to the neck or cap of the vial.Take the vail out of its packaging and shake gently until the compounds fall to the bottom of the vial.
2. For liquid products, please centrifuge at 500xg to gather the liquid to the bottom of the vial.
3. Try to avoid loss or contamination during the experiment.
Shipping Condition Packaging according to customer requirements(5mg, 10mg, 20mg and more). Ship via FedEx, DHL, UPS, EMS or other couriers with RT, or blue ice upon request.

Source of Nonin A

The mycelium of Alternaria dauci.

Nonin A Dilution Calculator

Concentration (start)
x
Volume (start)
=
Concentration (final)
x
Volume (final)
 
 
 
C1
V1
C2
V2

calculate

Nonin A Molarity Calculator

Mass
=
Concentration
x
Volume
x
MW*
 
 
 
g/mol

calculate

Preparing Stock Solutions of Nonin A

1 mg 5 mg 10 mg 20 mg 25 mg
1 mM 3.3299 mL 16.6495 mL 33.2989 mL 66.5978 mL 83.2473 mL
5 mM 0.666 mL 3.3299 mL 6.6598 mL 13.3196 mL 16.6495 mL
10 mM 0.333 mL 1.6649 mL 3.3299 mL 6.6598 mL 8.3247 mL
50 mM 0.0666 mL 0.333 mL 0.666 mL 1.332 mL 1.6649 mL
100 mM 0.0333 mL 0.1665 mL 0.333 mL 0.666 mL 0.8325 mL
* Note: If you are in the process of experiment, it's necessary to make the dilution ratios of the samples. The dilution data above is only for reference. Normally, it's can get a better solubility within lower of Concentrations.

Organizitions Citing Our Products recently

 
 
 

Calcutta University

University of Minnesota

University of Maryland School of Medicine

University of Illinois at Chicago

The Ohio State University

University of Zurich

Harvard University

Colorado State University

Auburn University

Yale University

Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Washington State University

Stanford University

University of Leipzig

Universidade da Beira Interior

The Institute of Cancer Research

Heidelberg University

University of Amsterdam

University of Auckland
TsingHua University
TsingHua University
The University of Michigan
The University of Michigan
Miami University
Miami University
DRURY University
DRURY University
Jilin University
Jilin University
Fudan University
Fudan University
Wuhan University
Wuhan University
Sun Yat-sen University
Sun Yat-sen University
Universite de Paris
Universite de Paris
Deemed University
Deemed University
Auckland University
Auckland University
The University of Tokyo
The University of Tokyo
Korea University
Korea University
Featured Products
New Products
 

References on Nonin A

Clinical Validation of Heart Rate Apps: Mixed-Methods Evaluation Study.[Pubmed:28842392]

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Aug 25;5(8):e129.

BACKGROUND: Photoplethysmography (PPG) is a proven way to measure heart rate (HR). This technology is already available in smartphones, which allows measuring HR only by using the smartphone. Given the widespread availability of smartphones, this creates a scalable way to enable mobile HR monitoring. An essential precondition is that these technologies are as reliable and accurate as the current clinical (gold) standards. At this moment, there is no consensus on a gold standard method for the validation of HR apps. This results in different validation processes that do not always reflect the veracious outcome of comparison. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper was to investigate and describe the necessary elements in validating and comparing HR apps versus standard technology. METHODS: The FibriCheck (Qompium) app was used in two separate prospective nonrandomized studies. In the first study, the HR of the FibriCheck app was consecutively compared with 2 different Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared HR devices: the Nonin oximeter and the AliveCor Mobile ECG. In the second study, a next step in validation was performed by comparing the beat-to-beat intervals of the FibriCheck app to a synchronized ECG recording. RESULTS: In the first study, the HR (BPM, beats per minute) of 88 random subjects consecutively measured with the 3 devices showed a correlation coefficient of .834 between FibriCheck and Nonin, .88 between FibriCheck and AliveCor, and .897 between Nonin And AliveCor. A single way analysis of variance (ANOVA; P=.61 was executed to test the hypothesis that there were no significant differences between the HRs as measured by the 3 devices. In the second study, 20,298 (ms) R-R intervals (RRI)-peak-to-peak intervals (PPI) from 229 subjects were analyzed. This resulted in a positive correlation (rs=.993, root mean square deviation [RMSE]=23.04 ms, and normalized root mean square error [NRMSE]=0.012) between the PPI from FibriCheck and the RRI from the wearable ECG. There was no significant difference (P=.92) between these intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the most suitable method for the validation of an HR app is a simultaneous measurement of the HR by the smartphone app and an ECG system, compared on the basis of beat-to-beat analysis. This approach could lead to more correct assessments of the accuracy of HR apps.

Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of Pulse Oximeters and Factors Affecting Their Performance in a Tertiary Intensive Care Unit.[Pubmed:28764215]

J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jun;11(6):OC05-OC08.

INTRODUCTION: Pulse oximetry is a widely used tool, unfortunately there is a paucity of data investigating its accuracy in Intensive Care Units (ICU) and if they are able to meet mandated FDA criteria as claimed by them in critically ill patients. AIM: To assess bias, precision and accuracy of pulse oximeters used in ICU and factors affecting them. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study, including 129 patients admitted to the ICU of a tertiary referral centre. Pulse oximetry and blood gas were done simultaneously. Pulse oximetry was done using two pulse oximetres: Nonin And Philips. All physiological variables like haemoglobin, lactate, use of vasopressors and blood pressure were recorded. Bland Altman curves were constructed to determine bias and limits of agreement. Effect of physiological variables on bias and difference between performance characteristics of bias was determined using SPSS. RESULTS: Pulse oximetry overestimated arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) by 1.44%. There was negative correlation between bias and SaO2 (r=-0.32) and positive correlation with lactate (r=0.16). The Philips pulse oximeter had significant higher bias and variability than Nonin pulse oximeter. (2.49+/-2.99 versus 0.46+/-1.68, mean difference = 1.98, 95% C.I. = 1.53 - 2.43, p-value <0.001). CONCLUSION: Pulse oximetry overestimates SaO2. Bias tends to increase with rising lactate and hypoxia. There is heterogeneity in performance of various pulse oximetry devices in ICU.

Keywords:

Nonin A,1357351-29-1,Natural Products, buy Nonin A , Nonin A supplier , purchase Nonin A , Nonin A cost , Nonin A manufacturer , order Nonin A , high purity Nonin A

Online Inquiry for:

      Fill out the information below

      • Size:Qty: - +

      * Required Fields

                                      Result: